Showing posts with label The Musical Reversal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Musical Reversal. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Resistance

To my elders,

I resist a lot of things. I resist going to bed at night. I resist falling asleep, even when I am tired. I resist growing up. I resist new technology. I resist external forces of change. I resist (some) authority. And I resist liking new music by much loved bands.

Now, this last one sounds stupid. I know that. By why mess with a good thing? As much as I want loads of new songs and endless albums from the bands I love the most, I almost hate it when they release a new album. What if I don't like it? What if its disappointing? What if the sound quality blows? And then there is always the issue of having to learn a whole new album. Such a chore.

So today, when I found out that one of my absolute favourite bands, the one that made me cry at the thought of not liking them because of some bizarre twist of musical fate, aka Library Voices, launched their new website today, including an adorable new emblem, some concert dates, an announcement of a new album out this August (!) and a stream of a new song, I was actually minorly concerned. Would this song be good? Could it possibly still capture what I love about them? Would it take 20 listens for me to hear something of value in this song, only to leave me with a weird memory of not having liked it the first 15 times? (Which of course, even if I didn't like it, I would still keep listening, just in case.)


So here is a link to the new website where you can listen to the song and watch a video from their last album. The new song is called "Generation Handclap" and the album is entitled "Summer of Lust." I anticipate many songs about picnics and falling in love and reading obscure novels on blankets on a grassy hill with ill-fated loves. Or maybe I'm just reading too much into titles...

But to sum up the song itself, the first few bars are a little awkward and left me somewhat sceptical, but about 28 seconds in it makes a pleasant turn to self deprecation ("... this is generation drunk text") and more melody based guitars. And some horns in the background. Which is nice. Subtle, and nice. And surprisingly 60s in the quality of the music. Which I am a big fan of. But really, the piece de resistance of the song is the line "They say you are what you read. You can be Copeland. I'll be Murakami." Which is mostly just cute and quaint and clever referencing to semi-obscure philosophers (or, at least, I think Copeland is a philosopher from the 50s... I may be wrong about this). But also amazing because of the following: (Which is from the random rants or missed connections section of Craig's List about a year ago.)

"You stole my Murakami at Library Voices - (The Horseshoe)
First of all, stealing people's stuff in general isn't cool. But then to steal someone's BOOK from a LIBRARY VOICES show? Seriously? ... I'll forgive you if you write something neat in it and then leave it on a subway. But that's about it."

I think two love letters to Library Voices is enough for now. I will try not to base any more posts about them until the album actually comes out. But I am totally buying the 7" single if they have it at NXNE next week.

-K

Thursday, May 19, 2011

The Musical Representation

To my elders,

While E may think her propensity to sing along with music in cars is... well, she loves it. The amount of effort she has put into mix tapes and now cds in her life is unbelievable. She trained me in the ways of rock music when I was a kid. She would tape stuff off the radio, purposefully cut off the bit where the DJ would say who it was or the name of the song, and then quiz me. No, seriously. And bonus points if I knew about where the band was from, etc. And yet we didn't care about their personal lives. Because their personal lives could do nothing but potentially ruin the music. Ahem, Matt Good being a... well, you know what I mean.

So has this carried on into my adulthood? Mostly. I know at least what country a band is from. Though I imagine most people do. But sometimes, despite what might be better judgment, I read interviews with some of the bands I like. Tragic, I know. A Dangerous Pastime, as it were. (Pun intended. Pour vous, E). So far I have managed to not let anything I've read change how I feel about the music. Or, after a few weeks, I no longer care. But it still makes me happy when a band I like actually turns out to be as witty and great in interview or story and they are in their songs. And I don't just mean in media stories. I volunteer at a music festival in the summer, and one of my friends once worked performer meals. Which means that she basically met everyone who played at the festival and, you know, stuck around for more than just their set. So Final Fantasy, aka Owen Pallett, is actually as adorable in real life as he is in interviews and between song banter in concert. And Library Voices, who are clever and smart and well read in song, made puns about The Last Supper and there being 12 of them to fill out the table when going for the Sunday night meal.

And that story doesn't even begin to encapsulate how much I love and appreciate Library Voices music. I may think E's loosing her voice to singing along in the car is slightly embarrassing (hey, it happens. The voice loss part, the embarrassment is just for when it happens to me), but its got nothing on my band love. For Christmas, E got me Chuck Klosterman's Hypertheticals. Which are freakin hilarious and awesome. Though I don't think they spark as much debate as CK would have liked. One of these questions, my favourite questions, The Musical Reversal, goes as follows:

"Assume everything about you musical tastes was reversed overnight. Everything you once loved, you now hate; everything you once hated, you now love. For example, if your favourite band has always been R.E.M., they will suddenly sound awful to you; they will become the band you dislike the most. By the same token, if you've never been remotely interested in the work of Yes and Jethro Tull, those two groups will instantly seem fascinating. If you generally dislike jazz today, you'll generally like jazz tomorrow. If you currently consider the first album by Veruca Salt to be slightly above average, you will abruptly find it to be slightly below average. Everything will become its opposite, but everything will remain in balance (and the rest of your personality will remain unchanged). So - in all likelihood - you won't love music any less (or any more) than you do right now. There will still be artists you love and who make you happy; they will be merely all the artists you currently find unlistenable.

Now, I concede that this transformation would make you unhappy. But explain why."

E and I had a long discussion about whether this question was even possible. Not that its ridiculous, because that is the point, but the part that says that your personality will stay the same. I suppose if this happens overnight my magic, your personality would stay the same, but if this is asking you to imagine your life if this were the case, it is, E claimed, impossible. But for the moment, let's assume the first. That its magical, and you wake up and think its completely weird. It would be interesting to find out what band you hated the most, since you will now love them, and who you are really indifferent to, because they will not have changed. So why would it make you unhappy? We have decided it is because you like the music you like for a reason. It reflects all the tiny huge things about yourself that you rarely even think about. Or, if you're me, only ever really thought about while having an extended conversation defending rock music to a hip-hop music lover, via hand written notes in 11th grade English class. (I had to do something to pass the time, and finding a music lover with such different tastes was fascinating.) So I, like E, values lyrics. Values the message of a song. I also value whether the music itself is interesting. Whether the singing blends with the melody (which is good) or is its own instrument, adding new levels to the song (which is creative and cool and not that common, and I hate to admit it, but is the reason why the singer from Fall Out Boy is far better than he should be). I like the melody and the rhythm and choruses and songs that have only 1 verse but are sung through twice with no chorus (like Mr. Brightside by the Killers and about a million Less Than Jake songs).

How is this embarrassing? Because when we thought about what The Musical Reversal would mean if it happened to us, E said she wouldn't be able to listen to Sammie anymore, aka the Sam Roberts Band, and I said that it "would, like, hurt my soul if I thought Library Voices made bad music." And I proceeded to tear up. And not voluntarily. I actually started to cry. And I was laughing at myself while doing it, but it still went on for a solid 5 minutes. My mother was making fun of me. But I couldn't help it. It was like my heart knew how wrong it was, not to like this band. Not to like all the bands I adore. Because they are who I am. I have always been this way. I had an existential crisis when I started listening to softer music in university and felt like I had abandoned the punk and ska of my teenage years. I admit that this is possibly a bad way to be. But then, I started crying from the thought of waking up one day and not liking Library Voices. So I don't think I really have any say in the matter.

-K

One of my favourite Library Voices songs: Bookish.